Does a copyright need to be used if covers are not profitable?
1. Cover other people’s songs, even if they are in tune Just like the original singer, there is no need to pay any fees to the original performer.
2. If you cover and record a song for personal use, according to the three-standard test theory of the fair use standard, you do not need to purchase the copyright.
3. If you want to publish, you need to purchase the distribution rights.
4. If you need to perform acupuncture, you need to purchase the performance rights.
5. It is recommended to purchase the performance rights directly. Many of the subsequent rights can be implemented by the performance rights holder.
In addition, there is no right to cover.
Legal provisions
According to Article 10 of the Copyright Law As the author of song lyrics, the copyright owner enjoys the right to publish, the right to protect the integrity of the work, the right to distribute, the right to perform, etc. These rights can be transferred or exercised by others with the permission of the copyright owner, and the copyright owner has the right to obtain them in accordance with the agreement or legal provisions. remuneration. Cover singing is a performance act. According to Article 37 of the Copyright Law, if a performer uses other people's works for a performance, the performer must obtain permission from the copyright owner and pay remuneration.
In fact, covers generally do not require copyright, because the covers add their own things to a certain extent, such as techniques, timbres, etc., so they do not require the copyright of the original singer. Faced with the situation where the cover song is not profitable and you are worried that you will be held accountable for copyright issues by the original singer, how to solve the problem is better. You can ask a lawyer from the Legal Savior Network.
