Is copying photographic works infringement?

For scholars majoring in painting, they may see some photographic Works being copied. So in the process of copying, have they infringed on the copyright of the work? Below, in order to help everyone better understand the relevant legal knowledge, the editor of Legal Savior Network has compiled the following content. I hope it will be helpful to you.

Does copying of photographic works constitute infringement?

Article 20 of the Copyright Law Article 2 Under the following circumstances, a work may be used without the permission of the copyright owner and without payment of remuneration to the copyright owner, but the name of the author and the title of the work shall be specified, and other rights enjoyed by the copyright owner in accordance with this law shall not be infringed:

(1) For personal study, research or appreciation, using the published works of others;

(2) For personal study, research or appreciation, Introduce and comment on a certain work or explain a certain issue, and appropriately quote the published works of others in the work;

(3) To report current affairs news, in newspapers Unavoidable reproduction or citation of published works in newspapers, periodicals, radio stations, television stations and other media;

(4) Newspapers, periodicals, radio stations, television stations, etc. The media publishes or broadcasts current articles on political, economic, and religious issues that have been published by other newspapers, periodicals, radio stations, television stations, etc., unless the author declares that they are not allowed to be published or broadcast;

(5) Newspapers, periodicals, radio stations, television stations and other media publish or broadcast speeches delivered at public gatherings, unless the author declares that they are not allowed to be published or broadcast;

(6) For school classroom teaching or scientific research, translate or copy a small amount of published works for use by teaching or scientific researchers , but shall not be published or distributed;

(7) State agencies use published works within a reasonable scope to perform official duties;

(8) Libraries, archives, memorial halls, museums, art galleries, etc., reproduce works collected by the library for the purpose of display or preservation of versions;

(9) Free performance of published works, the performance does not charge fees to the public, nor pay remuneration to the performers;

(10) Copying, painting, photographing, and videotaping works of art installed or displayed in outdoor public places;

(11 ) Translate works written in the Chinese language that have been published by Chinese citizens, legal persons or other organizations into ethnic minority languages ​​for domestic publication and distribution;

(10 2) Convert already published works into Braille for publication.

The provisions of the preceding paragraph shall apply to restrictions on the rights of publishers, performers, producers of audio and video recordings, radio stations, and television stations.

"Interpretation of the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Law in the Trial of Copyright Civil Disputes"

Article 18 The artistic works in outdoor public places as stipulated in Article 22 (10) of the Copyright Law refer to sculptures, paintings, calligraphy and other artistic works that are installed or displayed in outdoor public places.

Those who copy, paint, photograph, or videotape the artistic works specified in the preceding paragraph may reuse their results in a reasonable manner and within a reasonable scope without constituting infringement. .

The above content is the relevant answer. In the process of copying, the copyright of the other party is infringed. In fact, according to the current situation, it does not constitute infringement, but it must be There are reasonable processing methods and scope of use. This requires the consent of the copyright owner. If you have other legal issues, you can consult the relevant lawyers on the Legal Savior Network.