Is it infringing to use Internet pictures as an avatar?

There are many beautiful Internet pictures. If you like these Internet pictures, you may use them as your own avatar. Will using Internet pictures as your avatar involve infringement? Below, in order to help everyone better understand the relevant legal knowledge, the editor of Legal Savior Network has compiled the following content. I hope it will be helpful to you.

Is it infringing to use Internet pictures as avatars?

If it is just personal non-profit reprinting and use, it is generally not enough to constitute infringement. However, if the photo owner explicitly prohibits it or the law has prohibitive provisions, it may constitute infringement.

Infringement of copyright must meet the following three conditions ：

1. The fact of infringement is that the perpetrator used the copyright without the permission of the copyright owner and did not comply with the conditions of use stipulated in the copyright law. Works of the copyright holder, as well as performances, audiovisual products and radio and television programs. Copyright infringement does not require the consent of the author or other copyright holders, nor does it fall under fair use or statutory use. This is unauthorized use of the work, and is therefore a violation of copyright law. This kind of infringement may not only cause damage to other people's personal rights of copyright, but also may cause damage to other people's copyright property rights, and may also damage other people's personal rights and property rights of copyright at the same time. For example, illegally copying other people's works may only infringe others' copyright property rights, while counterfeiting other people's works often infringes other people's personal rights and property rights at the same time.

2. The behavior is illegal. Copyright is an absolute right, and everyone is responsible for the obligation of inaction not to infringe this right. . Others must abide by copyright law and other relevant legal provisions when using copyrighted works. If an actor violates the provisions of the law, his behavior is illegal. As for works that are not protected by my country's copyright law, works that have not been copyrighted, or "works" that have entered the public domain, there is no infringement issue when others use them.

3. Subjectivity of the perpetratorFault The so-called fault refers to the infringer's psychological state regarding his infringement and its consequences, including intentional and negligent forms. The vast majority of copyright infringements are intentional; there are also a few that can be caused by intentionality or negligence. Distinguishing the form of fault has certain significance in determining the legal liability of the tortfeasor. Generally speaking, the legal liability for intentional torts is heavier than the legal liability for negligent torts.

Based on the relevant answers to the above content, we can conclude that if you use Internet images for normal use, it will not constitute infringement. If you use online images for profit, the use will constitute infringement, and you may be sued in this case. If you have relevant legal advice, you can call the online lawyers of the Legal Savior Network for answers.