Is there a risk of infringement if the video is marked for reprinting on the Internet?
According to Article 42 of the Copyright Law, “Audio and video producers have the right to license others to copy, distribute, rent, disseminate to the public through information networks and receive remuneration for the audio and video products they produce.”
Article 48, Item 4: "Anyone who reproduces, distributes, or disseminates to the public through information networks the audio and video products produced without the permission of the audio and video producer shall bear infringement liability."Although Paragraph 1 of Article 22 stipulates restrictions on this copyright: "For personal study, research or appreciation, use of works that have been published by others, You can do this without the permission of the copyright owner and without paying him any remuneration, but you should specify the name of the author and the title of the work, and you must not infringe on other rights enjoyed by the copyright owner in accordance with this law." However, reposting other people's works to other platforms is obviously not for personal appreciation. , and the copyright owner's copyright is not affected by whether the rights owner declares "reprinting prohibited". Therefore, this situation should be regarded as copyright infringement.
Infringement of copyright must meet the following three conditions: 1. Infringement The fact is that the perpetrator used the copyright owner's works, as well as performances, audio-visual products, and radio and television programs without the copyright owner's permission and without complying with the conditions of use stipulated in the copyright law. Copyright infringement does not require the consent of the author or other copyright holders, nor does it fall under fair use or statutory use. This is unauthorized use of the work, and is therefore a violation of copyright law. This kind of infringement may not only cause damage to other people's personal rights of copyright, but also may cause damage to other people's copyright property rights, and may also damage other people's personal rights and property rights of copyright at the same time. For example, illegally copying other people's works may only infringe others' copyright property rights, while counterfeiting other people's works often infringes other people's personal rights and property rights at the same time. 2. The behavior is illegal. Copyright is an absolute right, and everyone is responsible for the obligation of inaction not to infringe this right. Others are using the copyright to makeYou must abide by copyright law and other relevant legal provisions when making products. If the perpetrator violates the provisions of the law, his behavior is illegal. As for works that are not protected by my country's copyright law, works that have not been copyrighted, or "works" that have entered the public domain, there is no infringement issue when others use them. 3. The perpetrator is subjectively at fault. The so-called fault refers to the infringer’s psychological state regarding his infringement and its consequences, including intentional and negligent forms. The vast majority of copyright infringements are intentional; there are also a few that can be caused by intentionality or negligence. Distinguishing the form of fault has certain significance in determining the legal liability of the tortfeasor. Generally speaking, the legal liability for intentional torts is heavier than the legal liability for negligent torts.
According to the relevant answers to the above content, it can be concluded that if the video is marked, there will be a risk of infringement if it is reprinted from the Internet, and his permission must be obtained It will not constitute infringement. If the video is prohibited from being reprinted, you must not reprint the video. If you have relevant legal advice, you can call the online lawyers of the Legal Savior Network for answers.
