1. Copying, distributing, performing, screening, broadcasting, compiling, and disseminating the works to the public through information networks without the permission of the copyright owner;
2. Publishing books for which others have exclusive publishing rights;
3. Without performing Permit, copy, and distribute audio and video recordings of his or her performance, or disseminate his or her performance to the public through information networks;
4. Without the permission of the person who made the audio and video recording, Copying, distributing, and disseminating to the public through information networks the audio and video products produced by them;
5. Playing or copying radio or television without permission;
5. p>
6. Without the permission of the copyright owner or copyright-related rights holder, deliberately avoid or destroy the copyright or copyright-related protection measures adopted by the rights holder for his or her works or audio and video products. Technical measures for rights;
7. The right to intentionally delete or change works, audio and video products, etc. without the permission of the copyright owner or copyright-related rights holder Managing electronic information;
8. Producing and selling works that counterfeit the signature of others.
Elements: 1. Illegal. The Copyright Law stipulates that citizens, legal persons or non-legal entities with certain specific qualifications enjoy copyright or copyright-related rights and interests, and also stipulates that all others have the relative obligation not to interfere with it. A breach of these obligations constitutes a breach of the law. In some cases, the law does not stipulate relative obligations to others, and no illegal behavior occurs. For example, using works or materials that are not protected by copyright, making uses that do not require permission from the copyright owner, and performing activities beyond the control of copyright or copyright-related rights and interests are not considered infringements under copyright law.
2. There is objective existence of damaging facts. Damage refers to behavior that causes property losses and mental harm to others. Damage is the objective consequence of illegal behavior. If an act is being planned and has not yet caused any harm, it does not constitute an infringement. For example, a publishing house takes away a manuscript of an author's book without authorization and prepares it for publication, but due to some subjective reasons it is not published in the end.constitute infringement. However, if it has been published, even if a single book has not been sold, it should still be considered to constitute infringement.
3. There is a causal relationship with the fact of damage. In other words, the performance of a certain act is the cause of the fact of harm. For example, Person B rewrites an article written by Person A into another article and submits it to a newspaper for publication without authorization. This act of Person B causes damage and therefore meets one of the conditions for infringement. If Person B just practices writing and rewrites an article written by Person A into another article without intending to publish it, and after being seen by the enthusiastic Person C, he recommends it to the newspaper for publication without authorization, Person C's behavior should be considered The fact that caused A's damage has a causal relationship. As for B's rewriting only for practicing writing, it should be within the scope of fair use and has no necessary causal relationship with the fact of damage.
4. The person who performed the act is at fault, or although he is not at fault, he still bears civil liability in accordance with the law. That is to say, the actor knew the harmful consequences of the act when he committed the act, or should have foreseen it but failed to do so, or he had foreseen it and believed it could be avoided. For example, if a publishing house knowingly knows that a certain work has copyright, or believes that it does not have copyright without any definite basis, it publishes the work without the consent of the copyright owner. This intentionality or negligence is a fault, and thus meets the conditions for infringement. If a publishing house publishes author B's work without the knowledge and guarantee of author B, and then author A claims that author B's work is an infringing product, the publishing house will stop immediately
