1. The fact that there is infringement is that the perpetrator uses the copyright owner's works without permission from the copyright owner and does not comply with the conditions of use stipulated in the copyright law. , as well as performances, audiovisual products and radio and television programs. Copyright infringement does not require the consent of the author or other copyright holders, nor does it fall under fair use or statutory use. This is unauthorized use of the work, and is therefore a violation of copyright law. This kind of infringement may not only cause damage to other people's personal rights of copyright, but also may cause damage to other people's copyright property rights, and may also damage other people's personal rights and property rights of copyright at the same time. For example, illegally copying other people's works may only infringe others' copyright property rights, while counterfeiting other people's works often infringes other people's personal rights and property rights at the same time.
2. The behavior is illegal. Copyright is an absolute right, and everyone is responsible for the obligation of inaction not to infringe this right. Others must abide by copyright law and other relevant legal provisions when using copyrighted works. If an actor violates the provisions of the law, his behavior is illegal. As for works that are not protected by my country's copyright law, works that have not been copyrighted, or "works" that have entered the public domain, there is no infringement issue when others use them.
3. The perpetrator is subjectively at fault. The so-called fault refers to the infringer's psychological state regarding his infringement and its consequences, including intentional and negligent forms. . The vast majority of copyright infringements are intentional; there are also a few that can be caused by intentionality or negligence. Distinguishing the form of fault has certain significance in determining the legal liability of the tortfeasor. Generally speaking, the legal liability for intentional torts is heavier than the legal liability for negligent torts.