What is the difference between non-patent technology transfer and franchise use
Non-patent technology transfer is an act of transfer and occurs There is a transfer of ownership; a franchise is a license and no transfer of ownership occurs.
Non-patented technology is also called proprietary technology. It refers to various technologies and know-how that are not known to the outside world, have been adopted in production and business activities, do not enjoy legal protection, and can bring economic benefits. Non-patented technologies generally include industrial know-how, commercial trade know-how, management know-how, etc.
Franchise use does not refer to "a certain" franchise that requires payment for use, but a type of right. Most of this type of right belongs to the intellectual property category (not Except for patented technology), after all, intellectual property rights are the main force of rights in modern society that can be used for a fee and legally traded. Non-patented technology is included in the franchise.
Also known as "proprietary technology" and "technical know-how". It refers to technical knowledge not known to the outside world, such as unique design, shape, formula, calculation formula, software package, Manufacturing process and other process know-how, technical secrets, etc. are a kind of intangible assets of enterprises. Like patent rights, non-patent technology can put enterprises in an advantageous position in competition and bring economic benefits to enterprises in the future years. Different from patent rights Yes: Non-patented technology is not registered with the patent office and relies on confidentiality means to monopolize. Therefore, it is not protected by law and has no validity period. As long as it is not leaked, it can be effectively used and transferred for a fee. Non-patented technology can be disclosed to the outside world It is purchased and recorded according to the actual price paid. However, most non-patented technologies are self-created by enterprises. Self-created non-patented technologies require a large amount of research and development costs, and in principle should be capitalized and amortized later. However, Non-patented technologies are often gradually formed through long-term experience accumulation in production and operations, and it is impossible to predict whether non-patented technologies will be formed. Even if they are intentionally formed, it is impossible to identify which expenditures are related to future non-patented technologies. Therefore, in practice CUHK will not be capitalized. According to the provisions of the current financial system, the valuation of non-patented technologies should be evaluated and confirmed by statutory evaluation agencies.
The above is the relevant content summarized by the editor of Legal Savior Network. If there is anything else you cannot understand about this article, you can find a lawyer for consultation and guidance through Legal Savior Network , they can tell you the answer directly.
