Whether web snapshots constitute an infringement of the right to modify web works

The emergence of the Internet has changed people's Work and lifestyle, and the Internet has also brought about a series of problems. The biggest problem is the problem of Internet crimes. Internet infringement is one of the most common illegal and criminal acts. So, does a web page snapshot constitute an infringement? Infringement of the right to modify web works? The editor of Legal Savior Network will provide readers with relevant answers below.

Whether webpage snapshots constitute an infringement of the right to modify webpage works

Whether web snapshots constitute the right to modify web works Infringement depends on the specific circumstances. If the original author modified it himself, it does not constitute infringement.

1. Changes in copyright law refer to Make partial changes to the content of the work and corrections to the text and terminology.

2. Web page snapshot text filtering of the original web page Does it constitute a modification of the original work?

1. If the content on the webpage belongs to the webpage designer, and the designer owns the copyright for both textual works and picture works, then the behavior of webpage snapshots has infringed on the designer’s right to copy the textual works. I think it is important to discuss whether it infringes upon modification. Quan does not have much practical significance.

2. If the web pageThe content on does not belong to the web designer. For example, the content is some information that has entered the public domain or is the work of others. Web designers have their own unique selection and arrangement of web content (text, pictures, videos, etc.), so the web page may constitute a compilation work. Whether web snapshots infringe upon the web designer's right to modify becomes a matter of practical significance. Because this may involve whether the author of the compilation work can prohibit the behavior of web page snapshots. Regarding this situation, let me share some of my superficial opinions:

(1) The right to modify copyright in my country refers to the right to modify one's own work or authorize others to modify the work. The modifications mentioned here refer to partial changes to the content of the work and corrections to the text and terminology. Of course, when it comes to the modification of works, the copyright laws of major foreign countries are regulated by the right to protect the integrity of the work (we will not discuss here whether the right to modify the work has any significance). Copyright places the right of modification in the moral rights part of the copyright, which mainly involves changes to the content of the work, rather than changes to its expression form and purpose, because this is the scope of the adaptation right. I think the main function of the right of modification is to prevent others from modifying the content of the work, causing the work to not correctly reflect the author's thoughts and concepts. Since the content of the compilation work comes from others or the public domain, it is difficult for us to say that the web snapshot only selects the textual information in the web page as a modification of the compilation work.

(2) From the perspective of the work, I think It does not mean that what we identify as a work enjoys all rights under copyright law. For example, product design drawings are restricted by the basic principle of "no protection of practical functions" in the copyright law. As a result, the authors of such works cannot enjoy certain rights under the copyright law or are subject to certain restrictions when exercising copyright. In my opinion, considering the particularity of the compiled works, the author of the compiled works should not enjoy the right of modification and adaptation or should be subject to certain restrictions when exercising his rights.

(3) From the perspective of rights, the right to modify There are certain restrictions on exercise. For example, in newspapers and periodicals, periodical publishers can make textual changes or abridgements to works without the author's consent. Then, if the author of the compiled work is given the right to modify, considering the existence of the compiled work and the content of the work comes from others or the public domain, then the authorIt is worth considering whether there are certain restrictions on the author's right to amend.

(4) If the web designer is given the right to modify , may also lead to copyright protection fact. Web page snapshots filter out the background, pictures, sounds, videos, etc. of the original web page to obtain the text content inside. In fact, the final effect of this behavior is the same as when we copy the text content on the web page, or type it out one by one, and then publish it to the web page. The difference is that web page snapshots are completed using the advanced technology of modern computers, while we use the most traditional methods to complete it. If just selecting the text data from the web page infringes the right to modify the compiled work, it means that the author of the compiled work has the right to prohibit it. The result of this is that even though this part of the content is only factual, we cannot obtain it. This is contrary to the purpose of copyright.

The above knowledge is the editor’s understanding of "webpage snapshots are Will it constitute an infringement of the right to modify the web work?" Whether the web snapshot constitutes an infringement of the right to modify the web work depends on the specific circumstances. If the original author modified it himself, it does not constitute infringement. If readers need legal help, they are welcome to go to the Legal Savior Network for legal consultation.